I happen to be translating a novel by Agatha Christie for my own benefit. There is a line in the middle spoken by a character as if were a literary quote from someone else. I tried to use Google to find where it came from. The first things it came up with were explanations of what the line means, explanations that are totally unnecessary for anyone with a good grasp of the English language. True, it is a bit mysterious in context, but the reader isn't supposed to know what it means in context yet. With a some digging through entries I was able to learn that it wasn't a quote at all, but a kind of summary of a poem written hundreds of years ago.
The disturbing thing was that the first entry in Google returns was from an AI generated article on the "quote" from Wikipedia. The AI result was complete crap. Beyond getting her name correct, it totally misidentified the character who spoke the line. I can imagine some poor high school student using the article for a source in a high school theme paper and getting giant red marks all over it, for not having read the book. Do we really need to go back to the bad old days when so many Wikipedia articles were so filled with garbage that it was often only those who knew something specific about a topic that could separate the valuable from the crap? I sure as hell am not going to help Wikipedia sort out blatant AI problems so that less obvious and more insidious mistakes can slip through into their articles.
The disturbing thing was that the first entry in Google returns was from an AI generated article on the "quote" from Wikipedia. The AI result was complete crap. Beyond getting her name correct, it totally misidentified the character who spoke the line. I can imagine some poor high school student using the article for a source in a high school theme paper and getting giant red marks all over it, for not having read the book. Do we really need to go back to the bad old days when so many Wikipedia articles were so filled with garbage that it was often only those who knew something specific about a topic that could separate the valuable from the crap? I sure as hell am not going to help Wikipedia sort out blatant AI problems so that less obvious and more insidious mistakes can slip through into their articles.