cactuswatcher: (Default)
([personal profile] cactuswatcher Jun. 14th, 2010 05:03 pm)

Texas turned down the PAC-10. It sounds like Texas really wanted to go, but Texas A&M, Oklahoma State and Oklahoma were all reluctant. Texas Tech in a better position geographically might have wanted to go. But I don't know that anyone bothered to ask them their opinion. A&M put its foot down and the deal fell through, at least the deal Texas wanted.

There will be some sort of conference network, but that's not the end of the TV news. The deal Texas is going to get from the Big12 (to have another additional private network) stinks, but Missouri, Kansas, Kansas State and Iowa State can probably form a mini-network and keep the profits which should remove some of the sting. I think Baylor, OSU and Texas Tech are pretty much screwed, because Texas, A&M and Oklahoma probably aren't going to share. The one intriguing thing about this deal is that it leaves the door wide open for... Notre Dame. All the comforts of the Big East with better football, less travel and they could keep their NBC profits for themselves.

From: [identity profile] dlgood.livejournal.com


I would assume Rice isn't really an option. They got left out when the SWC imploded because they weren't competetive. It mostly depends on $$ and they'll decide on whether they want another Texas team, or broader reach. Memphis, I'm sure, would be happy to step up in leagues.

At this point, I'm in favor of any situation that doesn't result in Maryland joining the Big Ten...
.

Profile

cactuswatcher: (Default)
cactuswatcher

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags